Economic recovery: lessons from the past for Europe’s future

As EU member states start to come out of lockdown, Europe is looking to the future beyond COVID-19.

In the last week of April, the EU flagged a €2 trillion reconstruction fund to finance Europe’s recovery. The exact shape of this response is unclear, and whether it will help resolve deep, historic tensions between Europe’s prosperous north and poorer south remains uncertain.

This followed calls from Italy, Spain, France and six other member states to finance recovery using so-called ‘corona bonds’: a form of mutualised debt, issued by the European Investment Bank, which would be shared by all EU member states. States like Italy and Spain, already heavily in debt and hardest hit by COVID-19, called for corona bonds as an act of solidarity from their neighbours, relieving the south of some of the economic burden that will follow the immediate health crisis.

Richer, northern European nations opposed the idea, led by the Netherlands, on the basis that their finances should not be used to prop up another nation’s response to the crisis. The Netherlands, and others, insisted that states draw on the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) to finance their recoveries. Germany’s resistance to debt mutualisation was decisive in ensuring corona bonds were taken off the table during negotiations of the ‘Eurogroup’ of EU Finance Ministers at the end of March.

Instead, the €540 million deal announced on 9 April set up several, interim measures ahead of the long-term EU recovery fund. This included a European Investment Bank fund of €200 billion, accessible to companies hit by the health crisis and a €100 billion commitment from the European Commission towards jobless reinsurance. It also made loans of up to two per cent of any member state’s economic output available under the ESM to cover emergency health costs.

Use of the ESM raises controversies and stirs old grievances within the EU. Italy and Spain remember how, in the Eurozone Crisis of 2010-2012, the strict conditions for structural reform attached to the ESM were used to set up a punitive regime of austerity in Greece. This time around, very few are openly contemplating austerity economics as a recovery tool. But the 9 April agreement’s vague language committing states using the ESM to ‘strengthen economic and financial fundamentals’ does little to ease southern states’ scepticism.

For them, the EU’s economic response is a test of both European solidarity, and their own divided politics. In Italy, early missteps in the procurement of ventilators and PPE fed resentment against wealthy, northern European nations. Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte knows that if his representations to the EU and other Member States are seen as weak, and if the EU is perceived as fiscally intransigent, then this may galvanise public opinion behind his hard-line Eurosceptic rival, Matteo Salvini.

By the end of April, it appeared some – including, crucially, German leaders – heeded these warnings. The reconstruction fund plan sets aside both corona bonds and the ESM. European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen has instead proposed using an increased EU budget to raise capital to finance member states’ recoveries. However, this still risks rehashing the debate over member state responsibilities to manage their own debt: should funds be issued to individual Member States in the form of grants, or loans; and, if loans, who is responsible for the debt incurred?

The economic response to COVID-19 has, far from the calls for ‘solidarity’, opened up divisions in the EU that go back not just to the 2010-2012 crisis, but the founding of the Eurozone in 1999. Lacking strong coordination of fiscal policy, among other things, growth in the common market strongly favours highly productive, export-oriented regions and member states, like Germany. For sceptics, this is the ‘original sin’ of the Eurozone, and the root cause of every European crisis.

Economic recovery across the EU will, certainly, require creativity, political will, and solidarity. Using recovery funds to boost productivity in struggling regions and nations is already being proposed as one way forward. Others have called for an emphasis on the environment in recovery policies, greater democratisation of EU institutions, or even full, fiscal union. For them, the question is existential: the alternative to a radical reimagining of the EU is the end of the European project.

05 May 2020

Engage

Visit the EU Centre site

Contact RMIT News

Find an expert

Study with us

Related News

ESAANZ 2022 Conference Report: The European Union in the Age of Global Turbulence

17 Jan 2023

On 24 November 2022, the European Studies Association Australia and New Zealand (ESAANZ), in partnership with RMIT University’s European Union Centre of Excellence, held its annual conference, themed The European Union in the Age of Global Turbulence.

COP27 Special: Transformation, not Targets

12 Dec 2022

COP27 was held in Sharm El-Sheik in November this year, and has already faded from the news cycle. In this reflective discussion, Emma is joined by Professors Ben Cashore and Navroz K Dubash, both of whom attended the meeting as observers.

Photo of a person sitting behind a desk. The left of the desk has a globe that is facing America and Africa, and the right of the desk has five books stacked on top of each other with the spine not being visible. The person is wearing a white long sleeved shirt with black dots, black glasses and is holding an EU flag in their right hand. Their left hand is resting on the desk. They are looking at the camera straight on and smiling.

Teaching the Teachers - Integrating the EU into Secondary School Curricula in Victoria and NSW

09 Feb 2022

Secondary School / High School Teachers in Victoria and New South Wales are invited to these workshops on integrating the European Union and European Studies into secondary school curriculum.

A colourful image of buildings and people with the text IURC at the top

Launch of European Union-Australia Cities Cooperation within the International Urban and Regional Cooperation (IURC) Programme

03 Dec 2021

With the assistance of the European Union Centre of Excellence at RMIT University, Brisbane, Canberra, and Melbourne will begin to establish cooperation on urban development with Barcelona, Florence, Hamburg, and Madrid within the IURC programme.

Load more +

Acknowledgement of Country

RMIT University acknowledges the people of the Woi wurrung and Boon wurrung language groups of the eastern Kulin Nation on whose unceded lands we conduct the business of the University. RMIT University respectfully acknowledges their Ancestors and Elders, past and present. RMIT also acknowledges the Traditional Custodians and their Ancestors of the lands and waters across Australia where we conduct our business - Artwork 'Luwaytini' by Mark Cleaver, Palawa.

More information

Economic recovery: lessons from the past for Europe’s future