The characteristic groups: Big5, Dark4 and demography
The research paints a complex picture of why some people engage in cyberbullying regularly and some do so very little or not at all. It reveals perpetrators of cyberbullying demonstrate a combination of characteristics, personalities and lifestyle choices that fit into three categories:
The Big5 is used widely by psychologists and breaks down an individual's personality into five factors – openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism.
The Dark4 focuses on negative personality traits, malicious in nature – psychopathy, narcissism, Machiavellianism (cunning or scheming) and sadism.
Demography – age, education, location, gender, and social media use experience.
Hossain said previous studies on the characteristics of a cyberbully were inconsistent as they focused on a confined group of personality traits, rather than a combination from the three groups.
"You can't explain someone’s behaviour with one or two characteristics. They possess a unique combination of characteristics that do not work in isolation,” Hossain said.
Men participate in cyberbullying more often than women
Hossain said while traits from the three characteristic groups work in combination to make a cyberbully, the research found men were more likely to cyberbully more often than women.
“We found less agreeable educated married males with high psychopathy and sadism are most susceptible to committing cyberbullying. Alternatively, a less-educated introvert female with high emotional stability and low psychopathy is less-likely to engage in cyberbullying,” Hossain said.
“But you can’t just boil it down to being an outgoing married man. The perpetrators also possess at least one trait from the Dark4 in combination with these.”
Understanding what drives people to cyberbully can play a role in prevention
Hossain said a combination of personality and demographic factors should be considered in designing actionable and proactive policymaking to address the challenge of cyberbullying.
“Hopefully our findings can contribute to introducing or reforming legislation, which often targets ‘the usual suspects’ to control cyberbullying,” he said.
“They provide practical guidance for creating preventive measures and behavioural programs tailored to the online world.”
Hossain said while designing programs to reduce cyberbullying, more attention needs to be given to the users with certain combinations of characteristics.
“The combination of personality and demography should be considered in designing actionable and proactive policymaking to address cyberbullying.”
“Social media administrators could use self-evaluation questions or gamification techniques to acquire information on characteristics from the users without making them feel invaded, and then predict cyberbullying acts beforehand.”
‘Are you a cyberbully on social media? Exploring the personality traits using a fuzzy-set configurational approach’ is published in the International Journal of Information Management (102537).
Dr Mohammad Hossain led the research in collaboration with Professor Matthew Warren from RMIT University, Mohammed Quaddus from Curtin University, Associate Professor Shahriar Akter from University of Wollongong and Professor Ilias Pappas from Norwegian University of Science and Technology and University of Agder.
People can visit the eSafety Commissioner’s website for information on handling cyberbullying and other online safety issues.