Australia’s 2026–2027 Federal budget: A turning point for tax, housing, and sustainability

Australia’s 2026–2027 Federal budget: A turning point for tax, housing, and sustainability

The Australian Federal Budget 2026–27 introduces one of the most ambitious economic reform agendas in recent decades. Framed around housing affordability, tax equity, and the climate transition, the budget proposes sweeping overhauls to capital gains tax (CGT), negative gearing, and sustainability reporting requirements.

While the government argues these reforms are vital to combat rising intergenerational inequality, temper the housing market, and future-proof the economy for a low-carbon future, the proposals have ignited debate among investors, economists, businesses, and taxpayers alike.

Capital Gains Tax (CGT) reform

At the core of the budget is a direct challenge to Australia’s long-standing tax concessions on property and capital investment.

Currently, individuals and trusts receive a 50% discount on capital gains tax for assets held for more than 12 months - a concession that has historically cushioned investors in property, equities, and other appreciating assets. The government proposes replacing this discount with a system that taxes only real gains by adjusting the asset's cost base for inflation through indexation. Concurrently, a minimum effective tax rate of approximately 30% on capital gains is expected to apply.

Treasury contends that the existing framework disproportionately rewards wealthy Australians and fuels speculative investment at the expense of productive economic activity. While the government anticipates this new framework will bolster long-term public revenue and improve tax fairness, the implications for stakeholders are stark (See Table 1 for details):

  • Property investors and high earners: Face significantly higher tax liabilities upon selling investment assets, suppressing after-tax returns.
  • First-home buyers: Stand to benefit if the suppression of speculative demand successfully moderates property price growth over time.

Table 1. Federal budget 2026–27: proposed changes in CGT and its implications

Current system

(Before Budget 2026–27)
  • 50% CGT discount for individuals and trusts on assets held >12 months
  • Full gain (nominal gain) taxed after discount
  • Applies to all capital assets (Property, shares, trusts, partnerships and other investments)
  • No indexation for inflation

Proposed changes

(From 1 July 2027 unless noted)
  • 50% discount removed
  • Cost-base indexation: gains adjusted for inflation (only "real" gains taxed)
  • Minimum effective tax rate of 30% on net capital gains
  • Applies broadly to investment assets (property, shares, trusts, partnerships and other assets)
  • Expected start: 1 July 2027
Implications for related stakeholders
  • Property investors: Lower after-tax returns; higher tax on gains
  • First-home buyers: Reduced speculative demand may help moderate house prices and improve affordability.
  • High-income / wealthy households: Less generous concessions; higher tax liabilities on asset sales.
  • Government: Higher revenue over time; supports funding for housing and social programs.

Negative gearing changes

In tandem with CGT overhauls, the budget introduces tight restrictions on negative gearing—the mechanism allowing property investors to offset rental losses against personal wage and salary income.

Under the new proposal, negative gearing benefits will be restricted almost exclusively to newly constructed homes starting July 2027. Investors purchasing existing residential properties after this date will lose the ability to offset rental losses against their employment income. Crucially, existing investments will be grandfathered, protecting current owners' tax concessions.

The policy aims to pivot investment capital away from established housing stock and directly into new supply, boosting the construction sector and easing housing shortages. However, the market outlook remains highly contested (See Table 2 for details):

  • The rental market: Investors may pivot away from older residential properties, potentially stalling activity in certain market segments, tightening rental supply, and driving up rents in already strained sectors.
  • Developers and builders: Will likely find new commercial opportunities as capital shifts toward newly built apartments and housing developments.

Table 2. Federal budget 2026–27: proposed changes in negative gearing and its implications

Current system

(Before Budget 2026–27)
  • Rental losses can be deducted from other income (e.g., salary/wages)
  • Applies to investment in both existing homes and new builds
  • No restriction on type of property
  • Broadly available to individual investors

Proposed changes

(From 1 July 2027 unless noted)
  • Negative gearing limited to newly constructed homes only
  • Existing residential properties purchased on or after 1 July 2027 will NOT be able to claim rental losses against other income
  • Existing investments (purchased before 1 July 2027) grandfathered
  • Policy aims to encourage investment in new housing supply
Implications for related stakeholders
  • Property investors (existing): Existing concessions protected (grandfathered).
  • Property investors (new buyers): Reduced tax benefits for older properties; may lower demand for existing homes.
  • Developers and construction sector: Positive impact from increased investment in new builds and pipeline of projects.
  • Renters: Mixed short-term impact; potential rental supply pressure as investor activity shifts.

Sustainability reporting and carbon assurance

Beyond property taxation, the budget accelerates Australia’s transition toward a low-carbon economy. While it stops short of introducing a new carbon tax, it places heavy emphasis on climate-related financial disclosures, emissions transparency, and sustainable investment frameworks.

The government continues to back mandatory sustainability reporting standards aligned with international frameworks like the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB). Consequently, large corporations must increasingly disclose climate risks, emissions profiles, and formal transition strategies. 

A pivotal emerging frontier under this budget is carbon assurance -the independent verification of sustainability and emissions data. Operating much like traditional financial auditing, carbon assurance is designed to guarantee the credibility and accuracy of corporate climate reporting.

The implications of sustainability reporting and carbon assurance are substantial for stakeholders (See Table 3 for details). For major enterprises-particularly across mining, energy, manufacturing, transport, and aviation-compliance and reporting overheads will rise. Companies must scale up investments in:

  • emissions measurement and tracking systems
  • ESG reporting frameworks
  • sustainability governance structures
  • external assurance and auditing services.

Conversely, these mandates present a major growth catalyst for the accounting and assurance sectors, where demand for ESG auditing, carbon accounting, and sustainability verification will surge. Institutional investors will also benefit from access to high-fidelity, reliable climate data to accurately price long-term physical and transition risks. Meanwhile, high-emission firms that fail to adapt quickly face mounting pressure, including reputational fallout, intense investor scrutiny, and escalating financing costs.

Table 3. Federal budget 2026–27: proposed changes in sustainability reporting and carbon assurance and its implications

Current system

(Before Budget 2026–27)
  • Voluntary climate-related disclosures for most entities
  • No mandatory sustainability reporting (except large entities under existing corporate reporting)
  • Limited carbon assurance requirements
  • No uniform global-aligned standards

Proposed changes

(From 1 July 2027 unless noted)
  • Strengthened climate-related financial disclosures aligned with ISSB standards
  • Expanded sustainability reporting obligations for large entities
  • Growth in "carbon assurance" – independent verification of emissions and sustainability data
  • Stronger governance and risk management expectations
Implications for related stakeholders
  • Large corporations (high-emission sectors): Higher compliance and reporting costs; need investment in emissions systems and governance.
  • Accounting and assurance profession: Greater demand for ESG, sustainability and carbon assurance services.
  • Investors and financial markets: More reliable data improves transparency, risk assessment and supports sustainable investment.
  • Broader economy: Supports transition to low-carbon economy; enhances global competitiveness and access to capital.

In all, the 2026–27 Budget signals a foundational shift in Australian economic policy. It attempts to rebalance the tax system away from heavily subsidized asset accumulation and redirect focus toward structural housing affordability, productive deployment of capital, and sustainable growth.

While presented as a blueprint for intergenerational fairness and economic resilience, these reforms remain highly sensitive for property investors and wealthy households who have built wealth strategies around these legacy tax advantages. Whether these policies can deliver structural affordability and climate readiness without destabilizing broader investment markets will dominate the nation's economic debate for years to come.

About the author

Md Safiullah (Safi) is a Senior Lecturer in Finance and Director of the Financial Markets and Sustainability Groups (FMSG) at RMIT University.

02 June 2026

Share

Return to RMIT News
02 June 2026

Share

Engage

Related News

suburban-streetscape-1220x732.jpg

Australia’s 2026–2027 Federal budget: A turning point for tax, housing, and sustainability

The Australian Federal Budget 2026–27 introduces one of the most ambitious economic reform agendas in recent decades. Framed around housing affordability, tax equity, and the climate transition, the budget proposes sweeping overhauls to capital gains tax (CGT), negative gearing, and sustainability reporting requirements.

solving-big-problems-acumen.jpg

Why solving big problems needs a new way to review literature

Grand Challenges cannot be solved by a single discipline. This can be about reducing food waste, addressing the climate crisis, helping people live healthier and other big aspirations. They demand bold, multidisciplinary solutions. Yet, when researchers attempt to synthesise existing knowledge to tackle these massive issues, they are often hindered by the very tools designed to help them.

hand-holding-phone-leaves-adobe-stock-1220x732.jpg

Can we achieve a more sustainable future through marketing

Advancing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is a priority for communities and nations around the world. While most solutions are engrained in STEM and environmental science, marketing appears to be an unlikely lever for sustainability and inclusion.

what-map-do-they-have-in-the-whitehouse-1220x732.jpg

What map do they have in ‘the Situation Room’ at the White House? Map Projections and Global Politics

I have only been inside the White House once, back in 1997. The only maps I recall seeing then were old ones, dating back to the 18th and 19th centuries. However, I was not important enough to see the inside of the Oval Office, let alone ‘the Situation Room.’

Load more +
aboriginal flag float-starttorres strait flag float-start

Acknowledgement of Country

RMIT University acknowledges the people of the Woi wurrung and Boon wurrung language groups of the eastern Kulin Nation on whose unceded lands we conduct the business of the University. RMIT University respectfully acknowledges their Ancestors and Elders, past and present. RMIT also acknowledges the Traditional Custodians and their Ancestors of the lands and waters across Australia where we conduct our business - Artwork 'Sentient' by Hollie Johnson, Gunaikurnai and Monero Ngarigo.

More information