The team’s results, published in Nature Communications, reveal that the RMIT-patented biomarkers – easily identified through a simple blood test – may be a better guide to who’ll potentially benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy than the current gold standard HRD test, meaning it requires urgent validation.
The current HRD test requires sufficient cancer tissue and the ability to perform complex analysis of DNA repair, which is not always available or feasible. In addition, the test may not provide an accurate reflection of the current DNA repair capability of the cancer, as this can change over time.
“Our test focused on a real-time blood immune response rather than on the DNA repair capability of the cancer, which may no longer be accurate. In doing so, we more accurately identified which SOLACE2 patients would most benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy,” Plebanski said.
WEHI lead and joint-senior author Professor Clare Scott AM, said an important finding was how immune cells in the cancer affected the response to PARP inhibitor therapy, particularly in combination therapy.
Scott, who leads WEHI’s Ovarian and Rare Cancer Laboratory and is the Chair of ANZGOG, said a clear indication of who would respond to treatment came from predicting whether effector T cells could increase their migration into the tumour, where they can start killing the cancer cells.
“Now that we understand this is a vital factor for cancer control, we could also potentially improve treatments by focusing on promoting this beneficial migration of immune cells in the future,” said Scott, who is also a medical oncologist at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Women’s Hospital and Royal Melbourne Hospital.
The new test is not currently available for patients, as it still needs to undergo further testing and confirmation before obtaining necessary approvals for routine use.
What the overall trial found
Professor Chee Khoon Lee, clinical lead at the University of Sydney’s NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre (CTC) and co-study chair, said the SOLACE2 clinical trial showed that three months of immune priming helped delay ovarian cancer recurrence when followed by treatment with the PARP inhibitor and immunotherapy.
“Despite the treatment benefit we saw with this approach, the small trial did not provide the definitive clinical validation we were seeking, so more work will be needed to validate that,” Lee said.
“However, our study did successfully reveal this new test that has the potential to transform outcomes for many women diagnosed with ovarian cancer, helping clinicians to better personalise treatments, ensuring each woman receives the most effective therapy for her.”
%201.jpg)
