RMIT experts available for comment on the bushfire royal commission final report

RMIT experts available for comment on the bushfire royal commission final report

Experts from RMIT University are available to talk about the bushfire royal commission report ranging from land use, and disaster recovery, to community education and essential services.

Bushfire at night

Land use regulation

Professor Michael Buxton (0417 153 872 or michael.buxton@rmit.edu.au)

Topics: urban and regional issues, environment, natural resources, bushfires, burn-offs and planning

“The report fails to provide a clear direction on land use planning as a crucial means to limit or prevent risk to communities from natural disasters. 

“While it agrees that land use planning and exposure to risk are 'inextricably linked', it doesn’t address the need for increased regulation.  

“It recognises that planning systems that allow building in high-risk areas create risk to individuals and that development in high-risk areas should be avoided.  

“But it concentrates only on the need to provide better information to new residents on risk, placing sole responsibility for risk onto individuals not government.

“It ignores the recommendations from other bushfire enquiries about the need for stronger planning controls to prevent new dwelling construction in high risk areas such as the edges of townships and rural landscapes.

“It concludes that states should consider risks in land use planning decisions. None of this is explained or given any detail on implementation.  

“While recognising that improved building regulations can reduce risk, it avoids any support for improving the capacity for existing buildings in high-risk areas, stating that buildings should be made 'sufficiently resilient.'” 

Michael Buxton is Emeritus Professor Environment and Planning at RMIT University. He acted as an advisor on land use planning to the 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission and has written extensively on small lot rural subdivision and bushfire risk.

Disaster recovery

Dr Mittul Vahanvati (+61 404 978 179 or mittul.vahanvati@rmit.edu.au)

Topics: disasters, climate change, housing reconstruction, build back better, resilience, design for social benefit, community-led­­ and systems thinking approaches

“The report’s proposed recommendations indicate that when a hazard occurs affected communities are not allowed by the current governance system to take the lead or act, rather, they are mandated to wait for emergency management personnel to lead.

“Hence, a major shift is required in current recovery and resilience programs to give power and funding to communities to implement their actions in collaboration with local councils, non-government organisations and the private sector.

“Furthermore, in a post-disaster context, funding is only allocated to rebuilding destroyed or heavily damaged houses, not to surviving homes.

“The Property Council of Australia told the Commission that ‘inappropriate building design and construction in the past has been widespread, leading to a built environment susceptible to damage’.”

“Given that roughly, three-quarters of all buildings in bushfire prone areas are not designed or constructed to bushfire safe standards, recommendation 19.4 falls short of addressing this vital gap in supporting those homeowners to adapt their buildings to higher bushfire standards.”

Mittul Vahanvati is a lecturer in Sustainability and Urban Planning in the Centre for Urban Research at RMIT University. Her research focuses on the long-term impacts of housing reconstruction projects following a disaster, socio-ecological systems resilience and community-led approaches. 

Community education

Dr Anthony Richardson (0468 672 996 or  anthony.richardson@rmit.edu.au)

Topics: resilience, complex systems, energy and complexity, systems collapse, limits to growth

“Chapter 10 of the Commission’s Report calls for community education around disaster risk and preparation, which is a welcome suggestion.

“However, the focus of such education programs must include a realistic understanding of what ‘resilience’ in such a context means.

”Too often the common understanding of resilience involves a mental image of an environment or community bouncing back.

“Our vulnerability is rising, and not every aspect of the Australian environment or lifestyle can ‘bounce back’. 

“Given the changing risk profile, managing stakeholder expectations, including those of the general public, will be a crucial element in the process of community education.

“A more realistic understanding of resilience will not be welcomed by all – we only have to consider houses built in flood zones along the Brisbane River, or in zones of high bushfire vulnerability.

“Yet, as the Report clearly states: ‘In some disasters, it is impossible to protect everyone’ (p.30). Promoting this more realistic understanding of resilience is where community education will be crucial.”

Essential services

“Chapter 11 of the Report focuses on essential services, and usefully acknowledges the importance of energy to the complex systems that make the Australian lifestyle possible.

“However, while there is a welcome focus on the global scale in terms of our national supply chains, there still needs to be a clear and central focus on liquid fuel insecurity in this country.

“Liquid fuels, including petrol and diesel, make possible all the other systems discussed in the report. We are rapidly approaching 100% reliance on imported fuel; a trend only accelerated by the recent announcement by BP that another refinery will close, leaving Australia with three refineries that are themselves at risk.

“It was disruptions to the fuel supply within Gippsland that led to food and fuel shortages, and stranded thousands of holiday makers in a bushfire zone with empty tanks. This was serious enough at a regional level, but a fuel supply chain disruption at the national level, would have catastrophic consequences.

“The recent federal government announcement that Australia will finally institute a meaningful liquid fuel reserve on Australian territory, where it would be of some use in a crisis, is another welcome development.

“Australia is increasingly reliant on uninterrupted supplies of imported liquid fuel.  It’s long past the time we recognise this vulnerability as the crucial element in the maintenance of all the complex systems that make life in Australia possible.”

Anthongy Richardson is an urban resilience expert and researcher in the Sustainable Planning Program at RMIT University.  His research involves the intersection between energy, socio-technological complexity, urban resilience and social change.

***

For media enquiries, please contact RMIT Communications: 0439 704 077 or news@rmit.edu.au

 

02 November 2020

Share

  • Environment

Related News

aboriginal flag
torres strait flag

Acknowledgement of Country

RMIT University acknowledges the people of the Woi wurrung and Boon wurrung language groups of the eastern Kulin Nation on whose unceded lands we conduct the business of the University. RMIT University respectfully acknowledges their Ancestors and Elders, past and present. RMIT also acknowledges the Traditional Custodians and their Ancestors of the lands and waters across Australia where we conduct our business - Artwork 'Sentient' by Hollie Johnson, Gunaikurnai and Monero Ngarigo.